Scroll Top
19th Ave New York, NY 95822, USA

数学代写|MATH2400 Mathematical Analysis

MY-ASSIGNMENTEXPERT™可以为您提供my.uq.edu.au MATH2400 Mathematical Analysis数学分析代写代考辅导服务!

这是昆士兰大学 数学分析课程的代写成功案例。

数学代写|MATH2400 Mathematical Analysis

MATH2400课程简介

Course Description: (Note: MATH1052 may be taken concurrently with MATH2400 by students who only took MATH1050 & MATH1051 in 1st year.) Bounded & monotone sequences. Sequences & series of real functions. Intermediate & mean value theorems, iterative procedures. Taylor’s Theorem & error estimates. Criteria for integrability. Vector functions, continuity & differentials. Implicit & Inverse Function Theorems & applications.

Assumed Background:

MATH1051, MATH1701, or have an equivalent qualification.

Prerequisites 

The course is a concise and rigurous introduction to the central concept in mathematical analysis: limits. This concept is used to develop further notions such as continuity, the differential and integral calculus of functions of single and several variables, the implicit and inverse function theorems, uniform continuity of functions and the uniform convergence of sequences of functions. By the end of this course, you will have a solid understanding of the fundamental principles of mathematical analysis and be able to use them to solve mathematical problems, rather than just mechanically applying techniques without a true understanding of their significance.

There is some overlap between this course and MATH2401. MATH2401 goes into greater depth and contains more difficult proofs.

MATH2400 Mathematical Analysis HELP(EXAM HELP, ONLINE TUTOR)

问题 1.

Let $B_1 \subset \mathbb{R}^d$ be the unit ball, $B_1=\left{x \in \mathbb{R}^d:|x|<1\right}$. Let $B=B(x, r)$ be any ball in $\mathbb{R}^d$ with center $x$ and radius $r>0$. Then $m(B)=r^d m\left(B_1\right)$.
Proof. We observe that $B=x+r B_1$, that is, $B$ is equal to a translation of a dilation of the unit ball. By translation and dilation properties of $m$, we have
$$
m(B)=m\left(x+r B_1\right)=m\left(r B_1\right)=r^d m\left(B_1\right)
$$

问题 2.

Let $E \subset \mathbb{R}^d$ be measurable, and let $\delta=\left(\delta_1, \delta_2, \ldots \delta_d\right)$ with each $\delta_i>0$. We define
$$
\delta E=\left{\left(\delta_1 x_1, \delta_2 x_2, \ldots \delta_d x_d\right):\left(x_1, x_2, \ldots x_d\right) \in E\right}
$$
Then $\delta E$ is measurable, and more specifically,
$$
m(\delta E)=\left(\prod_{i=1}^d \delta_i\right) m(E)
$$
Proof. First we observe that if $Q=\prod_{i=1}^d\left[a_i, b_i\right]$ is a closed rectangle, then $\delta Q=\prod_{i=1}^d\left[\delta_i a_i, \delta_i b_i\right]$. Then
$$
|\delta Q|=\prod_{i=1}^d\left(\delta_i b_i-\delta_i a_i\right)=\prod_{i=1}^d \delta_i\left(b_i-a_i\right)=\left(\prod_{i=1}^d \delta_i\right)\left(\prod_{i=1}^d\left(b_i-a_i\right)\right)=\left(\prod_{i=1}^d \delta_i\right)|Q|
$$
Let $\epsilon>0$. Since $E$ is measurable, there exists an open set $\mathcal{O}$ such that $m_(E \backslash \mathcal{O}) \leq \epsilon$. Let $\left{Q_j\right}_{j=1}^{\infty}$ be a covering of $E \backslash \mathcal{O}$ by closed cubes. Then $\left{\delta Q_j\right}$ is a covering of $\delta E \backslash \delta \mathcal{O}$ by closed cubes. (To see this, let $y \in \delta E \backslash \delta \mathcal{O}$. Then $y=\left(\delta_1 x_1, \ldots \delta_d x_d\right)$ where $x=\left(x_1, \ldots x_d\right) \in E \backslash \mathcal{O}$. Then $x \in Q_j$ for some $j$, so then $y \in \delta Q_j$.) We note that $\delta \mathcal{O}$ must be open since $\mathcal{O}$ is open. Thus $$ m_(\delta E \backslash \delta \mathcal{O}) \leq \sum_{j=1}^{\infty}\left|\delta Q_j\right|=\left(\prod_{i=1}^d \delta_i\right) \sum_{j=1}^{\infty}\left|Q_j\right| \leq\left(\prod_{i=1}^d \delta_i\right) \epsilon
$$
Since $\prod_i \delta_i$ is some constant, we can make $m_*(\delta E \backslash \delta \mathcal{O})$ arbitrarily small, hence $\delta E$ is measurable.
Now let $\left{Q_j\right}_{j=1}^{\infty}$ be a covering of $E$ by closed cubes. Then $\left{\delta Q_j\right}$ is a cover of $\delta E$ by closed cubes. (For analogous reasons to the above parenthetical note.) We also define
$$
\delta^{-1} E=\left{\left(\delta_1^{-1} x_1, \ldots \delta_d^{-1} x_d\right):\left(x_1, \ldots x_d\right) \in E\right}
$$
Using this notation, we can say that if $\left{R_j\right}_{j=1}^{\infty}$ is a covering of $\delta E$ by closed cubes, then $\left{\delta^{-1} R_j\right}$ is a cover of $E$ by closed cubes. With this identification, we can say that for any covering $\left{Q_j\right}$ of $E$ by closed cubes,
$$
\begin{aligned}
m(\delta E) & =\inf \left{\sum_{j=1}^{\infty}\left|\delta Q_j\right|\right}=\inf \left{\prod_{i=1}^d \delta_i \sum_{j=1}^{\infty}\left|Q_j\right|\right} \
& =\left(\prod_{i=1}^d \delta_i\right) \inf \left{\sum_{j=1}^{\infty}\left|Q_j\right|\right}=\left(\prod_{i=1}^d \delta_i\right) m(E)
\end{aligned}
$$

问题 3.

(#3 in Rudin) Prove Proposition 1.15: The axioms of multiplication imply the following statements for all $x, y$, and $z$ in a field $F$.
(a) If $x \neq 0$ and $x y=x z$ then $y=z$.
(b) If $x \neq 0$ and $x y=x$ then $y=1$.
(c) If $x \neq 0$ and $x y=1$ then $y=1 / x$.
(d) If $x \neq 0$ then $1 /(1 / x)=x$.
Note that (b) and (c) assert the uniqueness of the multiplicative identity and the multiplicative inverse respectively.

问题 4.

(#5 in Rudin) Let $A$ be a nonempty set of real numbers which is bounded below. Let $-A$ be the set of all numbers $-x$, where $x \in A$. Prove that
$$
\inf A=-\sup (-A) .
$$
Where the $\inf A$ is defined to be the greatest lower bound of $A$.

数学代写|MATH2400 Mathematical Analysis

MY-ASSIGNMENTEXPERT™可以为您提供MY.UQ.EDU.AU MATH2400 MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS数学分析的代写代考和辅导服务!

Related Posts

Leave a comment